It seems that Andragogy is well identified and the debate is whether to utilize andragogy techniques versus pedagogy techniques. This seems a hard question to answer. While traditional students (aged 18-24) are actually adults, they are still learning and have not had the experiences in life as adults may have. I think the prior experiences and the motivation for their higher education are the most important part of deciding the learning style. In my opinion, I would move more toward a andragogy style of teaching. This education style would be beneficial to all types of students. Younger students can learn from adult students and their experiences. Another aspect is that the younger students can help the adult students with the technological side of learning. Often, adult students may not have the technological expertise of the younger student. Making the learning experience beneficial for both is most important.
One article that I found (Forest III & Peterson, 2006), really made a powerful statement about andragogy. It discusses management education and that pedagogy is not applicable due to the fact that it does not encompass the needs of the adult learner. Pedagogy refers to reaching children and why would one teach children management? It has an excellent table that shows the Pedagogical Andragogical Learning Assumption. I would encourage everyone to view it.
This was a very interesting topic to read and I thoroughly enjoyed it!
References
Forrest III, S.P. & Peterson, T.O. (2006). It's called andragogy. Academy of Learning and Management Education. 5 (1): 113-122.
Sell, G.R. (2008). Meeting the needs of the adult learner. In R.M. Diamond (Eds.), Designing and assessing courses and curricula (pp. 257-270). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.